java - Are Custom Libraries Unprofessional? -


i'm still in university @ moment, , i'll either try security or programming job. first programming course used custom library came book. replaced , added many of basics of java arrays, custom math functions, input (scanner), hashmaps, queues , stacks.

if did land programming gig, considered unprofessional use given custom library such 1 above? either way, i've pretty weaned myself off of 75% of custom classes in favor of standard java classes/objects, wanted know if slipping in premade class textbook frowned upon. guys.

"custom library" broad category useful. libraries reimplement functionality that's standard in jre, such collections api, useless, , did more harm in educational setting. however, there large number of tools, particularly google guava (enhanced collections multisets , bimaps), apache commons tools (including string parsing, hashcode building, , like), slf4j/log4j logging, , runtime environments such spring standard in industry.

the general principle "don't reinvent wheel". if have example class out of textbook gets basic job done isn't in standard api or 1 of de facto standard third-party libraries, means use it, don't prefer professor's half-baked , untested implementation ones have been in use thousands of developers years.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to remove text and logo OR add Overflow on Android ActionBar using AppCompat on API 8? -

html - How to style widget with post count different than without post count -

url rewriting - How to redirect a http POST with urlrewritefilter -